February 21, 2022

Jess Moody Faith and Culture Forum Speakers Tackle AI, Tech and Future of Christianity

PBA News

Dr. Celia Deane-Drummond, director of the Laudato Si’ Research Institute at Campion Hall, University of Oxford, was one of three speakers at the Jess Moody Faith & Culture Forum.

Imagine a paraplegic using a mind-controlled suit to walk again. Or a frazzled employee with a brain implant that automatically dims the lights in his office when he’s feeling stressed. Or a driver spared from causing a deadly accident because his brain implant disables his company car when he’s too drowsy to drive.

Now imagine you’ve got one of those little computer chips in your brain, only instead of it being used for good, big companies like Amazon use it to convince you to buy something you don’t need without you ever realizing that you’ve been manipulated.

World-renowned ethicists and theologians critiqued these scenarios Thursday during the Jess Moody Faith & Culture Forum. Speakers included Dr. Brian Brock, chair in moral and practical theology at the University of Aberdeen (Scotland); Dr. Celia Deane-Drummond, director of the Laudato Si’ Research Institute at Campion Hall, University of Oxford; and Dr. Brent P. Waters, Jerre and Mary Joy Stead professor of Christian social ethics at Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary at Northwestern University. Such moral questions are also explored in PBA’s philosophy, technology and ethics course in the Master of Arts in Philosophy of Religion program.

Dr. Brent P. Waters, Jerre and Mary Joy Stead Professor of Social Ethics at Garret-Evangelical Theological Seminary, speaks at the Jess Moody Faith & Culture Forum.

The forum included multiple sessions throughout the day, drawing about 300 people.

Brock opened the forum by contrasting the transhumanist hope of fixing human bodies and defying biological death with the Christian hope of embracing one’s body and eventual death that leads to resurrection life. Brock drew from the example of a French man, known only as Thibault, paralyzed in all four limbs for four years who stood up and walked in a mind-controlled exoskeleton suit in a lab in France.

The expensive research resulted in Thibault’s limbs mimicking walking movements as though he was wearing a spacesuit.

“Thibault may have had a fun adventure in science, but it is unlikely to make any significant difference in his mobility in the years to come,” Brock said.

Humans already rely on a near-constant connection to the internet and smartphones, Brock observed, making the question not whether, but when, neurotransmitters will be embedded into healthy brains. This “surveillance capitalism” will give big tech companies like Facebook, Amazon and Google access to a “gold mine” of information to predict what consumers will do next, Brock said.

New technologies have applications for treating Parkinson’s disease, alleviating chronic pain and monitoring mental health. But Brock expressed worry about the increasingly common sentiment that institutions should invest in creating a statistically “normal” human rather than outfit communal space for people with disabilities.

Virtual and extended realities also have therapeutic uses for treating psychiatric disorders. However, these powerful tools are vulnerable to exploitation by bad actors because they are unregulated, Deane-Drummond said.

Dr. Celia Deane-Drummond’s research examines transhumanism from a scientific perspective. Transhumanist beliefs are incompatible with current neuroscience research, she said.

Her research examines transhumanism from a scientific perspective. Transhumanists believe the mind is equivalent to the person and that people should upload their brains onto a computer chip and insert it into prosthetics, Deane-Drummond said.

But transhumanist beliefs are inconsistent with current neuroscience, she said.

“What we do with our minds affects our bodies, and what we do with our bodies affects our minds,” she said.

Transhumanism offers “moral enhancements” such as controlling rage or making people less racist that may seem appealing, Deane-Drummond said. However, such “enhancements” are inherently immoral because they robotize humans at the cost of their freedom, she said.

Waters added that pharmaceuticals already control behavior quite a bit. While medication may improve quality of life, creative genius in artists and writers is often is destroyed, he said.

Churches and businesses are using virtual reality to create religious experiences that don’t necessarily align with the Christian understanding of a relationship with God, Deane-Drummond said.

Virtual reality can supplement the work of the church but it cannot replace it, Waters said.

“There’s something about physical proximity that is important to Christianity.”

Related Articles

Back to All News